The UK government’s Science and Technology Committee’s “Energy drinks and children” report has concluded that societal concerns could justify a ban on the sale of energy drinks to children, but found that the current quantitative evidence alone is not sufficient to warrant statutory legislation – for now. This comes despite a range of British health experts urging the UK government to push on with its proposals to ban energy drink sales to under-18s amid concerns over the potential negative impacts of excessive caffeine consumption on mental and physical health.
The British Dietetic Association (BDA) is urging the government to ban sales to children, while the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) says its “disappointed” with the findings from the UK government’s Science and Technology Committee.
The findings concluded that energy drink consumption among minors should be reduced, but found a lack of evidence for a statutory ban.The UK Department of Health and Welfare said: "The consultation on the end of the sale of children's energy drinks was recently closed and received a high level of interest. The answer will be published next year. "
According to the report, there is no conclusive evidence that energy drink consumption is linked to harmful health effects on children. Yet, parents and teachers show increasing concern on the matter and recognize a need to implement such a ban immediately, mostly due to the high caffeine levels of energy drinks.
BDA spokesperson Tom Embury, tells that, although the BDA would always welcome more research and evidence, carrying out quantitative studies on the impact of caffeine on children’s health is very difficult on ethical grounds.
The BDA notes that precautionary measures are necessary. The law already requires that energy drinks are labeled “unsuitable for children” due to the negative effects of increased caffeine consumption on mental and physical health.
“The BDA does not believe children should be consuming excess caffeine from any source, but energy drinks, because of their high per-unit caffeine content, appealing flavors and child-friendly marketing, are a particular problem. European law already requires that these drinks be described as unsuitable for children; so it seems a logical step to prevent their sale,” Embury adds.
Andy Burman, BDA Chief Executive, says: “The committee’s report states that children consume caffeine from a range of sources, including tea, coffee and other soft drinks. As far as we are concerned, this is beside the point; high consumption of caffeine from any source is not appropriate for children.”
“Our review of the evidence demonstrates that the use of energy drinks by children and young people is associated with a number of adverse outcomes and health-damaging behaviors,” states Dr. Amelia Lake, Dietitian and Associate Director for Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health at Teesside University, who has provided the committee with evidence.
Responding to the committee’s Energy Drinks and Children Report, Professor Russell Viner, President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) said: “Despite the committee acknowledging the impact energy drinks have on children’s energy levels, sleep, mental health and behavior, it is disappointing not to see a recommendation to ban the sale of these drinks to children under the age of 16.”
“We welcome the government’s recent focus on child health through the Childhood Obesity Plan and its Prevention Vision and agree that in relation to energy drinks, more research is needed in order to evaluate their full impact to child health. However, we believe that the evidence is already compelling that energy drinks bring no benefits and only harms to children.”
“In the meantime, I call on the government to protect children by bringing in a minimum price for energy drinks as we know their cheap price tag is a key driver for their purchase and this would make other drinks more affordable and appealing.”
Although the committee concluded that the existing quantitative evidence alone is not sufficient to justify a statutory ban, based on the range of qualitative evidence it:
“The BDA believes that the sale of energy drinks with more than 150 milligrams of caffeine per liter should not be permitted for sale to under 18s. This age limit is in keeping with alcohol and cigarettes and will be easier for retailers to implement as they will already have processes in place,” continues Embury.
The report says that the focus of its inquiry was energy drinks and children, but there are differences in how “children” are defined in different contexts. The government has consulted on whether to introduce a statutory ban on the sale of energy drinks to young people under the age of 16, 18 or another age and has yet to reach a definitive age, should a ban ever come into effect.
In January, Dutch doctors also called for a ban on the sale of energy drinks to under 18s in the Netherlands, The Dutch Society for Pediatrics said it is treating more and more young patients who report symptoms such as restlessness, fatigue and cardiac arrhythmia. A ban is highly unlikely, however, with the Dutch Ministry of Health responding dismissively to the calls.
Moreover, a nationwide survey of Canadian youth showed that over half of those who had ever consumed an energy drink had reported experiencing an adverse health event, including rapid heartbeat, nausea, and in rare cases, seizures.
Currently, Canadian legislation is meant to prohibit energy drinks from being marketed to children and energy drinks are not recommend to be used by people participating in sporting activities.
Additionally, the South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety banned the sales of coffee to all elementary, middle and high schools nationwide this past September. Products high in calories or caffeine, or low in nutrition were restricted or banned at schools, including coffee milk products.